What Teachers Can Learn About Leadership and Career Change from The Beastmaster

What does a 1982 fantasy movie filled with ferrets, bat-people, blue fire, and questionable leather wardrobe choices have to do with leaving teaching?

Quite a lot, actually.

In this episode of Teachers in Transition, Vanessa uses The Beastmaster as a surprisingly useful map for teacher career transition.

Dar begins the movie believing he is on a revenge mission. His home is gone. His identity has been shattered. The people in power have caused real harm, and he has every reason to be angry.

That emotional starting point may feel familiar to teachers preparing to leave the classroom.

The hero’s greatest strength is the very thing others see as strange. That same pattern shows up for teachers, who often minimize skills like communication, adaptability, leadership, relationship-building, and crisis management because they were treated as “just part of the job.”

This episode explores:

• Why your “weird” strengths may be your most valuable transferable skills
 • How networking is really built through trust and reputation
 • Why leaving teaching can feel like losing part of your identity
 • The difference between escaping a harmful system and building a better future
 • Why you are not starting over. You are learning to name what you already know how to do

Your transition does not have to stay focused on what education took from you.

It can become a rescue mission for your health, confidence, voice, family, and future.

Links

The Beastmaster on IMDb:
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0083630/

Schedule a free Discovery Session:
 https://teachersintransition.com/calendar

Listen to Teachers in Transition:
https://teachersintransition.buzzsprout.com

Questions or movie suggestions:
 Vanessa@TeachersinTransition.com

Optional support for the podcast:
 https://www.buzzsprout.com/277608/support

Support the Podcast!

If you enjoy this scrappy little indie podcast, please consider:

• sharing the episode with a teacher friend
• leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify
• supporting the show financially starting at just $3/month Support Teachers in Transition
   
   

Connect with Vanessa Jackson

• 💌 Email: Vanessa@teachersintransition.com
• 📱 Call or Text: 512-640-9099
• 📅 Book a Free Discovery Call: teachersintransition.com/calendar
• 🧭 LinkedIn: 
• 🔗 Bluesky: @beyondteaching.bsky.social
• 📸 Instagram & Threads: @teachers.in.transition
• 👍 Facebook: Teachers in Transition
• 🐦 X (Twitter): @EduExitStrategy

Bottom of Form

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

The transcript to this podcast is found on the episode’s homepage at Buzzsprout

Transcript

Hi!  Welcome back!  I am so happy you're here today!  It's summer, and there have been more challenges coming at me than I am used to in a small span of time, so I  thought I would settle in with a an old movie that was as ridiculous in its premise as its lead was stunning.  

That is probably not the most sophisticated opening confession I have ever made on this podcast, but it’s the truth. It’s been a bit of a rough summer for me, and I think I was looking for something comforting that didn’t challenge my brain too much.  So, I took advantage of the opportunity to revisit this sword-and-sorcery fever dream from the Reagan Era.  I was not disappointed – in one handy package, there are ferrets, fire, and a surprisingly useful metaphor for teacher career transition. I expected leather, practical effects, quicksand, feathered hair, questionable dialogue, and a soundtrack that believed in the movie more than the movie always believed in itself. I got all of that.

But I also got something else. Underneath all the 1982 fantasy chaos, The Beastmaster has a surprisingly sturdy moral structure. It starts like it wants to be a revenge story, but it becomes a rescue story. And once I saw that, I could not unsee it.  Most of the fantasy movies of this era (Conan the Barbarian being the most famous) are very revenge coded.  You destroy my village and now I have to take you out… that sort of thing. We live in a world where those in positions of authority above us want to use that authority to punish the other side.  Then the other side feels wronged and wants to… well, you get the idea.  It’s a circle of destruction, and we’re the ones who ultimately pay the price.  

So yes, we are talking about The Beastmaster today. We are talking about Dar, the animal companions, Kiri, Maax, Zed, the bat-people, and what this ridiculous movie has to say about weird skills, networking, rescue, identity, and why sometimes the thing they mocked was the thing they should have mentored.  And why revenge just isn’t a great strategy when one wants to move forward. 

Before we go any further, let me give you the short version of The Beastmaster, because otherwise this is going to sound like I am building a career-transition lesson out of ferrets, blue fire, and a stunning man in a leather loincloth.

The main character is Dar.  The main villain is Maax. Maax intended to kill Dar as a baby because a prophecy says Dar will one day kill Maax.  These fantasy movies are very kill-or-be-killed. Dar is raised by a man who saved him from the ritual death and has hidden him away and told him to hide his gift.  As a young man, Dad's village is destroyed by the Jun horde, a violent army serving Maax. Dar survives yet another attack.  Dar's gift is that he can communicate with animals, after his village is destroyed, he gathers to him his animal posse including an eagle, a black tiger, and two ferrets who are equal parts adorable and tiny criminal enterprise.

At first, it looks like Dar is headed out on a classic revenge mission. His people have been slaughtered, his home is gone, and Maax is tied to all of it. But as he travels, he keeps getting pulled into other people’s emergencies. He rescues Kiri, a woman enslaved by Maax’s “priests”. He saves a little girl from ritual sacrifice whose father then promises to help Dar whenever he needs it. He learns that Maax is sacrificing children to maintain power. He helps people in the city of Aruk resist a system that has kept them frightened and isolated.

Along the way, Dar meets Seth and Tal.  Seth is a guard who is looking out for Tal who is a rightful prince of Aruk, but his father, Zed, is imprisoned.  At some point, Dar discovers that Zed is his father, and Tal, the young heir to the kingdom, is Dar’s brother. Zed is focused on getting his city and crown back. Dar becomes focused on saving the people who are still alive.

That is the turn that matters to me. The Beastmaster starts as a revenge story, but it becomes a rescue story. It doesn’t even bother with redemption because there is nothing to redeem.  Dar was always pure. And Dar’s strange ability to connect with animals is not just a gimmick. It becomes the reason he can build relationships, gather allies, and do what an army alone cannot.

Let’s begin with the 1982 of it all, because this movie is very, very 1982. The costumes are equal-opportunity impractical, which I do have to respect.  In a lot of fantasy movies from this era, the women were dressed like they were allergic to fabric, but The Beastmaster does at least extend that design philosophy to the men. Everyone is out there fighting evil in leather, scraps, thigh exposure, and what appears to be a total lack of concern about sunburn. According to imdb.com, Marc Singer, who played Dar, referred to his character's costume as a "leather hula skirt".   According to the trivia section of this movie on IMDB, when he and John Amos saw each other on set for the first time in their respective costumes, they burst out laughing.

The movie also gives us all the required 80s adventure elements. There is quicksand, because remember every child of the 80s was trained to believe adulthood would include far more quicksand than it actually does. There are blue flames, toxic-looking blue goo, a city that may or may not be a model, and practical effects that show their seams but also show real human effort. I respect the practical effects. Even when I can see the evidence of them, I can also see the ambition.

But what surprised me is that The Beastmaster also breaks as many tropes as it follows. Dar is not just a vengeance machine. Kiri is not just a damsel in distress. The ferrets are not just comic relief. The hero cries. The weird gift is the real power. And at the end, when the movie could put Dar on the throne and call that victory, it does not.

Kiri, especially, is a more interesting character than the movie’s camera knows how to handle. Yes, she is filtered through the era’s fantasy gaze, but she is not helpless. She lays Dar out after he falsely claims a life debt and steals a kiss, which frankly he had coming. She operates with cunning when Dar wants to use brute force. She acts fearlessly and has a pivotal moment in the final battle – She’s the one who lights the tar moat (I’m coming back to this moat). Kiri was not powerless. 

I like that.  That wasn’t very common in the 80s.  If a woman was going to be a strong character it was usually in more of a subversive way.  This movie understands that “Needs rescue” does not mean “is weak.” Sometimes people need rescue because the system around them has power, weapons, numbers, and control. That does not erase their intelligence, courage, agency, or ability to light the tar moat when the moment comes. A teacher trapped in a bad system is not incompetent. She may be exhausted, constrained, under-resourced, and outnumbered by nonsense, but that does not mean she has forgotten how to think, act, lead, or fight back or light the fires of learning,

The whole point of this movie is that the main character, Dar, is special because he can communicate with animals. It’s IN the title!  He has a bond with an eagle, a pair of ferrets, and a panther. Or tiger painted black, because practical effects had budgets and tigers have agents.

There is a line from Seth that unlocks a lot of the movie for me. He says, “Face the animal on his own terms and you find you are not so very strong.” That is a better leadership lesson than most things I have heard in actual leadership trainings. Power is contextual. Those above you may be strong in their own arena, with their rules, but when they face another you on different terms, suddenly their strength may not translate.

Dar’s strength is not that he dominates animals. He doesn’t dominate them.  It is that he understands them. He observes them. He respects their nature. He reads their signals. That is why they help him. The Beastmaster’s strength is not control. It is relationship and collaboration.

That is also one of the least appreciated teacher skills. Good teachers meet people on their own terms. You cannot reach every student with the same approach. You read the room, read the child, read the silence, read the almost-tears, read the parent email, read the tone shift before the disruption. That is not softness. That is strategy. That is pattern recognition under pressure.

Dar does this over and over. When he gets a vision from the black tiger (that he has not yet met), he does not ignore it or explain it away. He trusts the signal and acts. Intuition is not magic. It never has been. Intuition is pattern recognition moving faster than language, and acted upon by people who were listening to it.  Raise your hand out there in if you’ve stopped a problem before it started and you weren’t even sure you could articulate how you knew it was brewing?  I know I have. I know you have too. 

If you haven’t seen, I have to talk about the bat-people, because of course have weird bat-people. The bat-people are one of those 80s fantasy creations where the movie clearly had a visual nightmare first and a plot explanation second. There is a creepy tree on a hill, there are winged people, there are bones, and the first time I saw it,  I had a lot of questions about that human stew situation. But the more useful question is: how does Dar know what to do with them?

I think Dar can read them because they exist in that strange borderland between human and animal. He does not necessarily speak their language. He reads the signal. He notices what they fear, what they revere, and what will make them move. If the eagle, Sharak is sacred to them, then the amulet they give Dar is not just jewelry. It is proof of relationship.

Ope – and we’re back to networking!! It’s always about the networking!  I know. It is ridiculous, but stay with me. Dar survives the creepy bat-people tree because he is connected to Sharak, and Sharak has status in a space Dar does not understand. Dar does not survive because he has the best elevator pitch. He survives because someone in his network has credibility in a room where Dar has none.

Later, when Dar calls the bat-people to the fight against the Jun horde in Aruk, he is networking again. That is not just animal magic. That is coalition-building. Dar does not have an army. He has a network.

His network includes Sharak, the tiger, the ferrets, Kiri, Seth, Sacco 9the little girls’ dad), the rescued people, and even the bat-people. It is not tidy. It is not polished. It would not all look good on LinkedIn. At one point, Dar’s face clearly says, “Maybe I should not have invited the bat-people.” But the point stands: his strength is not isolated heroism. His strength is connection.

This is such an important idea for teachers in transition because teachers often think networking means begging strangers for favors. It does not. Real networking is not just, “Can you get me a job?” Real networking is trust, relationship, reputation, and borrowed credibility. It is someone being willing to say, “I know her. I have seen her work. You should talk to her.”

Dar does not rescue Sacco’s daughter because he is networking. He rescues her because she needs saving. But that act creates trust. Sacco becomes a friend for life because Dar showed up when it mattered before he ever knew Sacco’s name. (in fact, I only know because I read the credits.)

Teacher friends, you forget how many people have seen you show up in meaningful ways. Parents have watched you encourage their child, protect their dignity, notice what others missed, explain the hard thing, make the call, send the email, stay late, write the recommendation, calm the crisis, or believe in a kid who was ready to quit. Former students, parents, colleagues, counselors, coaches, PTA people, community partners — these are not just “people from school.” They are witnesses to your work!

Your network is not just who you know. It is who has seen you care well.

And if you are a teacher thinking, “I do not have a network,” I would invite you to look again. You may not have named it. You may not have activated it. You may not have translated it into professional language. But chances are, you are already standing in the middle of one.

At one point, Dar is called a freak who can talk to animals and is sent away.  It is meant as an insult, but it names the exact thing that makes Dar powerful and special. That feels deeply GenX-coded to me. Our flaws were our nicknames. Adults did not always say, “That child has a unique gift.” They said, “Here comes Weird Kid Who Talks to Animals,” and then everyone was expected to build character about it.

A lot of people grow up learning to disguise their gifts because someone first named them as defects. Too sensitive. Too bossy. Too loud. Too intense. Too observant. Too much. Too weird. Too dramatic. Too smart for your own good. 

Teachers know this well. We are taught to make our strongest abilities look ordinary. We call leadership “just helping.” We call crisis management “part of the job.” We call deep observation “we know our kids We call the ability to read a room, adjust in real time, translate complexity, and hold forty-seven moving pieces at once “teaching.”

And then, when it is time to leave, many teachers struggle to name what they can do because they have spent years being told it was nothing special. Too verbal becomes communicator. Too protective becomes advocate. Too observant becomes analyst. Too intense becomes committed. Too good at reading the room becomes facilitator, trainer, manager, coach, or leader.

Teachers are often told their gifts are simply part of the job. Either way, the power gets minimized before it can be recognized. The work of transition is learning to name the gift for what it is — not because you have suddenly become someone else, but because you are finally willing to stop pretending it was ordinary.

And after Dar is sent away while they try the battle scheme that Dar has told them will not work, some one has to come to find him because now Dar has to save everyone by himself. 
 
 Doesn’t that just sound familiar? 

Now, if the networking theme is the career-transition thread, the emotional spine of the movie is this: revenge becomes rescue. Dar starts the movie in ashes. His village is destroyed. His father is killed. This dog dies saving Dar’s life. Because 80s movies were not afraid to hurt your feelings. They would give you a loyal dog, let you bond with him, and then say, “Anyway, here’s trauma.”

The obvious setup is revenge. Dar should be on a journey to punish the people who destroyed his home. And at first, that is what it looks like. But then the movie keeps putting someone in front of him who needs saving.

The ferret needs saving. Kiri needs saving. Sacco’s daughter needs saving. The children need saving. The people of Aruk need saving. Tal needs saving. Even the bat-people, in their own terrifying way, are not simply slaughtered by Dar when he has a chance to escape them. Again and again, Dar could turn toward vengeance, but he chooses not to.

That may be the biggest surprise of the movie. Sometimes we start off thinking we are after revenge, and it turns out to be a much bigger rescue mission. That feels very true to teacher career transition.

A lot of teachers leave thinking, “I just have to get out. I have to prove they were wrong. I have to reclaim what this system took from me.” And that is real. Anger is not automatically bad. Anger can be information. Anger can be the part of you that still knows something was wrong.

But if you stay in vengeance too long, it can keep you tied to the very system you are trying to leave. The healthier mission may become bigger than proving a point. You may be rescuing your health, your voice, your family, your future, your sense of self, and maybe helping other people see the exits too.

The movie makes this especially clear through the children and the ferrets. Maax’s world sacrifices children. Literally. The children are paying for the greed, fear, and power games of an entirely different society. Powerful adults are preserving themselves by putting the vulnerable on the altar.

That lands uncomfortably close to education. Adults build bad systems. Politicians protect bad incentives. Communities avoid hard conversations. Leaders issue statements. Then children and the teachers closest to them absorb the consequences. The people closest to the harm are rarely the people who created the harm.

Dar’s answer to that world is not policy. It is not a throne. It is not a speech. It is protection. He saves the little girl. He goes back when the Jun horde threatens. He says, “I can’t leave without my little ones.”

And yes, he is talking about the ferrets.

That line is one of the emotional centers of the movie. Kiri has seen Dar be strong, brave, strange, and annoyingly flirtatious. But “I can’t leave without my little ones” reveals his character. He does not rank lives by size, dignity, usefulness, or species. If they are his to protect, he protects them.

The ferrets start as comic relief, but the movie slowly makes them family. They steal arrows. They chew ropes. They commit tiny acts of sabotage. They become chaos contractors in Dar’s rescue operation. And then, spoiler alert, when one of them is lost, the grief is real. Again, Eighties movies weren’t afraid to punch you in the heartstrings. 

There is a moment when Dar is no longer carrying Kiri. He is carrying his ferret. That image gets me. Maax sacrifices the vulnerable to preserve power. Dar carries the vulnerable when they cannot carry themselves.

The villain puts children on the altar. The hero carries his grieving ferret.

That is the moral contrast of the movie in one image.

Teachers understand “I can’t leave without my little ones.” Not because teachers are saviors. Not because they own anyone. Not because martyrdom is healthy. (It is not) But because once you have been responsible for vulnerable lives, you do not casually walk away while they are still in danger.

And that is why leaving teaching can be emotionally complicated. It is not just leaving a job. It can feel like leaving your little ones. Even when you know that you have to go. Even when staying is hurting you. Even when the system has made it impossible to do the work without destroying yourself.

This is where the rescue mission has to widen. You may not be able to save everyone by staying. Sometimes the person you have to rescue is yourself. Sometimes the rescue is your family getting you back. Sometimes the rescue is your health, your sleep, your voice, your joy, and the next version of your work in the world.  I am able to do more to protect children and teachers outside the classroom than I could have inside of it.  And they do always tell you put your oxygen mask on before you put it on someone else on those airplanes.

I want to talk about the father/son dichotomy in  Zed and Dar, because this is where the movie gets unexpectedly deep. Zed is obsessed with Aruk as a place. The city. The throne. The title. The symbol. The thing that was taken from him. He is so tangled in vengeance and restoration that he is willing to get everyone killed trying to take it back.

Dar is different. Dar also lost everything. He also has reason to be angry. But Dar keeps choosing the people who are still alive.

Which reminded me of Odin in Thor: Ragnarok telling Thor that Asgard is a people, not a place. That is exactly the contrast here. Zed wants Aruk back as a place. Dar understands that Aruk only matters as a place if there are people to live there.

That is a powerful career-transition image. Career grief often gets tangled up in place. The classroom. The school. The title. The identity. The room where you knew who you were. The hallway where people knew your name. The bulletin boards. The routines. The version of yourself that made sense there.

And it is real grief. I do not want to minimize that. Leaving a place where you poured out your life is not nothing. Even when the place hurt you. Even when the system failed you. Even when you know it is time.

But sometimes the thing worth carrying forward is not the place itself. It is the people, the values, the skills, the relationships, and the part of you that knew how to care. The classroom may be a place. But teaching, at its best, was never only a room. It was attention. Translation. Encouragement. Protection. Adaptation. Leadership. Human connection under pressure.

Zed could see that. He was so attached to the symbol of power that he misses the living reality in front of him. He even rejects Dar. And when Maax reveals that Zed is Dar’s father, that rejection becomes even sharper. Zed did not just reject a strange outsider. He rejected his own son because Dar did not look like the kind of power Zed respected.

That happens in career transition too. Sometimes the people who should recognize your value are the least able to see it because they are too attached to the old title, the old role, or the old version of what success is supposed to look like. They see “teacher” and think they know the whole story. They don’t read the credits.

And that brings me to another little theme from this movie: labels versus reality. The caption says eagle, but the sound says hawk. Really – they use the sound of a hawk,  Hawks make cool sounds.  Eagles typically don’t. The system says professional, but treats teachers like children. It says support, but means extra unpaid labor. It says family, but somehow the family never has a budget. It says “teacher,” but the evidence says communicator, trainer, designer, analyst, advocate, project manager, crisis responder, and leader.

Dar is called a freak, but the evidence says he is the one who can save them. Kiri is dressed (barely) like a damsel, but the evidence says she is a fighter. The ferrets look like comic relief, but the evidence says they are essential team members. The bat-people look like monsters, but the evidence says they may also be allies if you understand the right signal.

Towards the end, Seth realizes that Dar is the rightful king, and tells Dar that he should be king. Dar gives it back. He does not care about perceived power. He does not need the throne to know who he is. He does not need the title to matter.

That is huge. Zed was willing to kill everyone to reclaim a place and a throne. Dar saves the people and walks away from the throne. Some people chase the throne. Some people make sure the kingdom survives.

That matters for teachers too. Leaving the classroom does not mean you stop mattering because you do not hold the old title anymore. You may not need the throne. You may not need the old room, the old system, or the old validation to know who you are. You may be moving into a kind of leadership that is less visible at first but far more aligned.

And then we get the uprising. Dar is fighting his way to the top, but the real victory begins when the people below realize they outnumber the priests. That is a beautiful moment. The system depends on them staying isolated, frightened, and obedient one at a time. But once they look around and realize there are more of them than there are of the people controlling them, the spell starts to break.

Oppressive systems depend on isolation. They need everyone to believe they are alone, outnumbered, and powerless. One isolated teacher can be dismissed as difficult. One isolated student can be labeled a problem. One isolated parent can be brushed off as unreasonable. But when people start comparing notes, the story changes.

The issue stops being personal failure and starts looking like structure, power, and control. The priests were never as powerful as they looked. They were just organized.

That is why connection matters. That is why networking matters. That is why teachers talking to each other matters. That is why naming what happened matters. Not because everyone has to burn everything down. But because silence protects the people who benefit from the silence.

In the final battle, we get plenty of classic 80s nonsense. The fight choreography is not exactly the best ever committed to film. Dar fights a Jun on horseback because apparently the movie still had a little more leather, dust, and dramatic grunting in the budget. And at one point I did wonder: if my main guy beats your main guy, shouldn’t the whole horde be required to stand down and update their org chart?

But underneath the nonsense, the contrast remains clear. Maax’s power comes from extraction. His world runs on fear, sacrifice, witches, Death Guards, priests, children, ritual, obedience, and whatever blue-flame nonsense is powering that temple. Maax does not create power. He consumes it.

Dar’s power comes from connection. Sharak, the tiger, the ferrets, Kiri, Seth, Sacco, the people, the bat-people, the children, the rescued, the witnesses. Dar does not consume power. He connects it.

That is one of the clearest ways to identify a healthy system versus a harmful one. Does it create capacity, connection, and dignity? Or does it feed on people until they are used up? Does it help the little ones survive? Or does it put them on the altar and call that leadership?

By the end of the movie, Dar has every traditional heroic credential. He has the bloodline. He has the prophecy. He has the sword. He has the victory. He could take the throne, but he does not. He rides away.

At first, it looks like the classic lone hero ending. Dar is heading back into the wilderness, still strange, still wild, still outside the city. But then Kiri comes up behind him. He is not alone anymore.

That is a small change, but it matters. Dar begins the movie alone in the ashes. He ends in the wilderness, still untamed, but not alone. He has connection. He has chosen family. He has a future that is not built only around what was taken from him.

And then the movie gives us baby ferrets. After all the sacrifice, fire, death guards, bat-people, questionable dialogue, and human stew implications, we get baby ferrets and a little kiss between the tiger and Mama Ferret. The little ones continue.

That ending is not accidental. Maax’s world devours children. Dar’s world protects the little ones. The future that wins is the one where the little ones live.

So what does The Beastmaster have to do with teacher career transition? So much More  than I expected, honestly.

It reminds us that the thing people called weird may be the thing that saves you. It reminds us that power does not always look like control, title, or throne. Sometimes power looks like relationship, perception, trust, and knowing who to call when the Jun horde shows up. It reminds us that leaving the old place does not mean losing everything. Sometimes it means discovering what actually comes with you.

Your skills come with you. Your values come with you. Your ability to read the room comes with you. Your network may come with you in ways you have not even named yet. Your voice comes with you. Your capacity to care comes with you, though I hope you learn to carry it in a way that does not require you to be sacrificed to prove it.

And maybe most importantly, The Beastmaster reminds us that what begins as a desire for revenge may become a rescue mission. You may start by wanting to prove them wrong. You may start by wanting justice for what the system took. That is understandable.

But the deeper work may be rescuing yourself from the altar. Rescuing your future from the place that wanted to keep consuming you. Rescuing your gifts from the labels that made you hide them. Rescuing the part of you that still knows how to connect, protect, translate, lead, and build a life beyond the ruins.

Dar does not end up on the throne. He ends on the road, with his people, his animals, his weirdness, his grief, and his future.

Still wild. No longer alone.

And honestly, for a movie with ferrets, feathered hair, and a black tiger, that is not a bad career transition message.

If you would like to talk more about your own potential career transition, I want to hear from you. You can book a Zoom call with me at teachersintransition.com/calendar.
 
 

Or…

 Got a movie you want me to cover to see if I can find deeper lessons in it?  Or a question you want answers?  Send me an email directly and let me know at Vanessa@teachersintransition.com.
 
 And finally, share this episode with someone who can’t believe that anyone can tie a 1980s fantasy movie to career transition.  

Because I just did!  I’ll see you here next week!

👋 CONNECT WITH VANESSA

• 💌 Email: Vanessa@teachersintransition.com
• 📱 Call or Text: 512-640-9099 
• 📅 Book a Free Discovery Call: teachersintransition.com/calendar
• 🔗 Bluesky: @beyondteaching.bsky.social
• 📸 Instagram & Threads: @teachers.in.transition
• 👍 Facebook: Teachers in Transition
• 🐦 X (Twitter): @EduExitStrategy

That’s the podcast for today! If you liked this podcast, tell a friend, and don’t forget to rate and review wherever you listen to your podcasts. Tune in weekly to Teachers in Transition where we discuss Job Search strategies as well as stress management techniques.  And I want to hear from you!  Please reach out and leave me a message at Vanessa@Teachersintransition.com  You can also leave a voicemail or text at 512-640-9099. 

I’ll see you here again next week and remember – YOU are amazing!